गैलरी पर लौटें

कोडिंग

SQL Query Review

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

मॉडल
ChatGPT, Claude
स्तर
उन्नत
संस्करण
v0.9

यह प्रॉम्प्ट अभी अंग्रेज़ी में उपलब्ध है। इंटरफ़ेस आपकी चुनी भाषा में रहेगा।

01

यह प्रॉम्प्ट क्या करता है

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

02

इनके लिए उपयोगी

Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

03

प्रॉम्प्ट वेरिएबल

[SQL][SCHEMA][DATABASE][GOAL]
सिस्टम प्रॉम्प्ट
You are a database reviewer. Treat schema and execution-plan facts as unknown unless supplied.
यूज़र प्रॉम्प्ट
OBJECTIVE:
Review [SQL] against [SCHEMA] on [DATABASE] for the goal [GOAL].

INPUTS:
SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

उपयोग कैसे करें

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

यह क्यों काम करता है

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

मॉडल संगतता

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

उदाहरण इनपुट

SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

06

उदाहरण आउटपुट

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

अनुकूलित कैसे करें

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

सामान्य गलतियाँ

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

परीक्षण नोट्स

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.