Kembali ke galeri

Pemrograman

SQL Query Review

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

Model
ChatGPT, Claude
Tingkat
Mahir
Versi
v0.9

Prompt ini saat ini tersedia dalam bahasa Inggris. Antarmuka tetap menggunakan bahasa pilihan Anda.

01

Fungsi prompt

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

02

Terbaik untuk

Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

03

Variabel prompt

[SQL][SCHEMA][DATABASE][GOAL]
Prompt Sistem
You are a database reviewer. Treat schema and execution-plan facts as unknown unless supplied.
Prompt Pengguna
OBJECTIVE:
Review [SQL] against [SCHEMA] on [DATABASE] for the goal [GOAL].

INPUTS:
SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

Cara menggunakan

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Mengapa berhasil

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Kompatibilitas model

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Contoh masukan

SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

06

Contoh keluaran

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Cara menyesuaikan

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Kesalahan umum

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Catatan pengujian

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.