Voltar à galeria

Programação

SQL Query Review

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

Modelos
ChatGPT, Claude
Nível
Avançado
Versão
v0.9

Este prompt está disponível em inglês. A interface permanece no idioma selecionado.

01

O que este prompt faz

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

02

Ideal para

Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

03

Variáveis

[SQL][SCHEMA][DATABASE][GOAL]
Prompt do sistema
You are a database reviewer. Treat schema and execution-plan facts as unknown unless supplied.
Prompt do usuário
OBJECTIVE:
Review [SQL] against [SCHEMA] on [DATABASE] for the goal [GOAL].

INPUTS:
SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

Como usar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Por que funciona

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilidade

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrada de exemplo

SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

06

Saída de exemplo

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Como personalizar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erros comuns

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notas de teste

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.