العودة إلى المعرض

البرمجة

SQL Query Review

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

النماذج
ChatGPT, Claude
المستوى
متقدم
الإصدار
v0.9

هذا الأمر متاح حالياً باللغة الإنجليزية. تبقى الواجهة بلغتك المختارة.

01

ماذا يفعل هذا الأمر

Review a SQL query for correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.

02

الأنسب لـ

Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

03

متغيرات الأمر

[SQL][SCHEMA][DATABASE][GOAL]
أمر النظام
You are a database reviewer. Treat schema and execution-plan facts as unknown unless supplied.
أمر المستخدم
OBJECTIVE:
Review [SQL] against [SCHEMA] on [DATABASE] for the goal [GOAL].

INPUTS:
SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Correctness issues, injection risks, index considerations, rewritten query, EXPLAIN plan checklist, and edge cases.

طريقة الاستخدام

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

لماذا ينجح

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

توافق النماذج

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

مثال الإدخال

SQL: [SQL]
SCHEMA: [SCHEMA]
DATABASE: [DATABASE]
GOAL: [GOAL]

06

مثال النتيجة

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

طريقة التخصيص

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

أخطاء شائعة

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

ملاحظات الاختبار

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.