Long Document Analysis

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

Modelle: Claude, Gemini
Stufe: Fortgeschritten
Version: v0.9

Dieser Prompt ist derzeit auf Englisch verfügbar. Die Oberfläche bleibt in der gewählten Sprache.

Was dieser Prompt leistet

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

Geeignet für

Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

Prompt-Variablen

[DOCUMENTS][QUESTION][EVIDENCE_RULE][OUTPUT_LIMIT]

System-Prompt

You are a document analyst. Use only supplied material and identify the location of every important claim.

Benutzer-Prompt

OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [DOCUMENTS] to answer [QUESTION]. Evidence rule: [EVIDENCE_RULE]. Output limit: [OUTPUT_LIMIT].

INPUTS:
DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

Anwendung

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Warum es funktioniert

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Modellkompatibilität

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

GeminiuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

Beispieleingabe

DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

Beispielausgabe

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Anpassen

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.