Voltar à galeria

Pesquisa

Long Document Analysis

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

Modelos
Claude, Gemini
Nível
Avançado
Versão
v0.9

Este prompt está disponível em inglês. A interface permanece no idioma selecionado.

01

O que este prompt faz

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

02

Ideal para

Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

03

Variáveis

[DOCUMENTS][QUESTION][EVIDENCE_RULE][OUTPUT_LIMIT]
Prompt do sistema
You are a document analyst. Use only supplied material and identify the location of every important claim.
Prompt do usuário
OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [DOCUMENTS] to answer [QUESTION]. Evidence rule: [EVIDENCE_RULE]. Output limit: [OUTPUT_LIMIT].

INPUTS:
DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

Como usar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Por que funciona

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilidade

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

GeminiuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrada de exemplo

DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

06

Saída de exemplo

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Como personalizar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erros comuns

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notas de teste

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.