Long Document Analysis

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

Models: Claude, Gemini
Level: Advanced
Version: v0.9

What this prompt does

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

Best for

Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

Prompt variables

[DOCUMENTS][QUESTION][EVIDENCE_RULE][OUTPUT_LIMIT]

System Prompt

You are a document analyst. Use only supplied material and identify the location of every important claim.

User Prompt

OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [DOCUMENTS] to answer [QUESTION]. Evidence rule: [EVIDENCE_RULE]. Output limit: [OUTPUT_LIMIT].

INPUTS:
DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

How to use

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Why it works

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Model compatibility

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

GeminiuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

Example input

DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

Example output

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

How to customize

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.