العودة إلى المعرض

البحث

Long Document Analysis

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

النماذج
Claude, Gemini
المستوى
متقدم
الإصدار
v0.9

هذا الأمر متاح حالياً باللغة الإنجليزية. تبقى الواجهة بلغتك المختارة.

01

ماذا يفعل هذا الأمر

Analyze long source material without losing citation boundaries or unresolved conflicts.

02

الأنسب لـ

Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

03

متغيرات الأمر

[DOCUMENTS][QUESTION][EVIDENCE_RULE][OUTPUT_LIMIT]
أمر النظام
You are a document analyst. Use only supplied material and identify the location of every important claim.
أمر المستخدم
OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [DOCUMENTS] to answer [QUESTION]. Evidence rule: [EVIDENCE_RULE]. Output limit: [OUTPUT_LIMIT].

INPUTS:
DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Executive answer, claim-evidence table, conflicts, missing information, confidence, and verification priorities.

طريقة الاستخدام

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

لماذا ينجح

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

توافق النماذج

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

GeminiuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

مثال الإدخال

DOCUMENTS: [DOCUMENTS]
QUESTION: [QUESTION]
EVIDENCE_RULE: [EVIDENCE_RULE]
OUTPUT_LIMIT: [OUTPUT_LIMIT]

06

مثال النتيجة

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

طريقة التخصيص

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

أخطاء شائعة

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

ملاحظات الاختبار

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.