ギャラリーに戻る

SEO

SEO Content Brief Generator

Turn a target query and business goal into a writer-ready search brief.

モデル
Claude, ChatGPT
レベル
中級
バージョン
v0.9

このプロンプトは現在英語で提供されています。画面は選択した言語のままです。

01

できること

Turn a target query and business goal into a writer-ready search brief.

02

最適な用途

Intent, reader questions, outline, entity checklist, evidence needs, internal-link ideas, conversion path, and risks.

03

プロンプト変数

[KEYWORD][AUDIENCE][COUNTRY][BUSINESS_GOAL]
システムプロンプト
You are an SEO editor who distinguishes search evidence from assumptions and avoids invented volumes.
ユーザープロンプト
OBJECTIVE:
Create a content brief for [KEYWORD] for [AUDIENCE] in [COUNTRY], aligned with [BUSINESS_GOAL].

INPUTS:
KEYWORD: [KEYWORD]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
COUNTRY: [COUNTRY]
BUSINESS_GOAL: [BUSINESS_GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Intent, reader questions, outline, entity checklist, evidence needs, internal-link ideas, conversion path, and risks.

使い方

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

効果の理由

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

モデル互換性

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

入力例

KEYWORD: [KEYWORD]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
COUNTRY: [COUNTRY]
BUSINESS_GOAL: [BUSINESS_GOAL]

06

出力例

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

カスタマイズ方法

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

よくある間違い

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

テストメモ

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.