갤러리로 돌아가기

SEO

SEO Content Brief Generator

Turn a target query and business goal into a writer-ready search brief.

모델
Claude, ChatGPT
난이도
중급
버전
v0.9

이 프롬프트는 현재 영어로 제공됩니다. 인터페이스는 선택한 언어로 유지됩니다.

01

프롬프트 기능

Turn a target query and business goal into a writer-ready search brief.

02

추천 용도

Intent, reader questions, outline, entity checklist, evidence needs, internal-link ideas, conversion path, and risks.

03

프롬프트 변수

[KEYWORD][AUDIENCE][COUNTRY][BUSINESS_GOAL]
시스템 프롬프트
You are an SEO editor who distinguishes search evidence from assumptions and avoids invented volumes.
사용자 프롬프트
OBJECTIVE:
Create a content brief for [KEYWORD] for [AUDIENCE] in [COUNTRY], aligned with [BUSINESS_GOAL].

INPUTS:
KEYWORD: [KEYWORD]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
COUNTRY: [COUNTRY]
BUSINESS_GOAL: [BUSINESS_GOAL]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Intent, reader questions, outline, entity checklist, evidence needs, internal-link ideas, conversion path, and risks.

사용 방법

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

효과적인 이유

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

모델 호환성

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

입력 예시

KEYWORD: [KEYWORD]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
COUNTRY: [COUNTRY]
BUSINESS_GOAL: [BUSINESS_GOAL]

06

출력 예시

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

수정 방법

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

자주 하는 실수

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

테스트 노트

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.