Voltar à galeria

Marketing

Customer Persona Evidence Map

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

Modelos
Claude, ChatGPT
Nível
Intermediário
Versão
v0.9

Este prompt está disponível em inglês. A interface permanece no idioma selecionado.

01

O que este prompt faz

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

02

Ideal para

Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

03

Variáveis

[CUSTOMER_DATA][PRODUCT][MARKET][DECISION]
Prompt do sistema
You are a customer research lead. Never turn unsupported assumptions into demographic facts.
Prompt do usuário
OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [CUSTOMER_DATA] for [PRODUCT] in [MARKET] to support [DECISION].

INPUTS:
CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

Como usar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Por que funciona

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilidade

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrada de exemplo

CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

06

Saída de exemplo

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Como personalizar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erros comuns

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notas de teste

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.