العودة إلى المعرض

التسويق

Customer Persona Evidence Map

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

النماذج
Claude, ChatGPT
المستوى
متوسط
الإصدار
v0.9

هذا الأمر متاح حالياً باللغة الإنجليزية. تبقى الواجهة بلغتك المختارة.

01

ماذا يفعل هذا الأمر

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

02

الأنسب لـ

Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

03

متغيرات الأمر

[CUSTOMER_DATA][PRODUCT][MARKET][DECISION]
أمر النظام
You are a customer research lead. Never turn unsupported assumptions into demographic facts.
أمر المستخدم
OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [CUSTOMER_DATA] for [PRODUCT] in [MARKET] to support [DECISION].

INPUTS:
CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

طريقة الاستخدام

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

لماذا ينجح

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

توافق النماذج

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

مثال الإدخال

CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

06

مثال النتيجة

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

طريقة التخصيص

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

أخطاء شائعة

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

ملاحظات الاختبار

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.