Kembali ke galeri

Pemasaran

Customer Persona Evidence Map

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

Model
Claude, ChatGPT
Tingkat
Menengah
Versi
v0.9

Prompt ini saat ini tersedia dalam bahasa Inggris. Antarmuka tetap menggunakan bahasa pilihan Anda.

01

Fungsi prompt

Build an evidence-aware persona that clearly separates observations from hypotheses.

02

Terbaik untuk

Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

03

Variabel prompt

[CUSTOMER_DATA][PRODUCT][MARKET][DECISION]
Prompt Sistem
You are a customer research lead. Never turn unsupported assumptions into demographic facts.
Prompt Pengguna
OBJECTIVE:
Analyze [CUSTOMER_DATA] for [PRODUCT] in [MARKET] to support [DECISION].

INPUTS:
CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Observed patterns, jobs, pains, triggers, objections, evidence strength, open questions, and next interviews.

Cara menggunakan

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Mengapa berhasil

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Kompatibilitas model

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Contoh masukan

CUSTOMER_DATA: [CUSTOMER_DATA]
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
MARKET: [MARKET]
DECISION: [DECISION]

06

Contoh keluaran

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Cara menyesuaikan

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Kesalahan umum

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Catatan pengujian

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.