Retour à la galerie

Vidéo

UGC Video Shot List

Create a practical short-form UGC concept with hook, shots, dialogue, and production notes.

Modèles
General LLM
Niveau
Intermédiaire
Version
v0.9

Ce prompt est disponible en anglais. L’interface reste dans la langue choisie.

01

Ce que fait ce prompt

Create a practical short-form UGC concept with hook, shots, dialogue, and production notes.

02

Idéal pour

Hook options, time-coded shots, dialogue, on-screen text, product proof, B-roll, CTA, and claim check.

03

Variables

[PRODUCT][AUDIENCE][PLATFORM][DURATION]
Prompt système
You are a short-form video creative director who prioritizes credible demonstrations over unsupported claims.
Prompt utilisateur
OBJECTIVE:
Plan a [DURATION] UGC video for [PRODUCT], aimed at [AUDIENCE] on [PLATFORM].

INPUTS:
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
PLATFORM: [PLATFORM]
DURATION: [DURATION]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Hook options, time-coded shots, dialogue, on-screen text, product proof, B-roll, CTA, and claim check.

Mode d’emploi

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Pourquoi ça marche

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilité

General LLMuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrée exemple

PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
PLATFORM: [PLATFORM]
DURATION: [DURATION]

06

Sortie exemple

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Personnalisation

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erreurs fréquentes

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notes de test

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.