Voltar à galeria

Vídeo

UGC Video Shot List

Create a practical short-form UGC concept with hook, shots, dialogue, and production notes.

Modelos
General LLM
Nível
Intermediário
Versão
v0.9

Este prompt está disponível em inglês. A interface permanece no idioma selecionado.

01

O que este prompt faz

Create a practical short-form UGC concept with hook, shots, dialogue, and production notes.

02

Ideal para

Hook options, time-coded shots, dialogue, on-screen text, product proof, B-roll, CTA, and claim check.

03

Variáveis

[PRODUCT][AUDIENCE][PLATFORM][DURATION]
Prompt do sistema
You are a short-form video creative director who prioritizes credible demonstrations over unsupported claims.
Prompt do usuário
OBJECTIVE:
Plan a [DURATION] UGC video for [PRODUCT], aimed at [AUDIENCE] on [PLATFORM].

INPUTS:
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
PLATFORM: [PLATFORM]
DURATION: [DURATION]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
Hook options, time-coded shots, dialogue, on-screen text, product proof, B-roll, CTA, and claim check.

Como usar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Por que funciona

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilidade

General LLMuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrada de exemplo

PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
PLATFORM: [PLATFORM]
DURATION: [DURATION]

06

Saída de exemplo

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Como personalizar

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erros comuns

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notas de teste

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.