Retour à la galerie

Marketing

Facebook Ad Copy Framework

Create distinct paid-social ad angles without repeating the same claim.

Modèles
ChatGPT, Claude
Niveau
Débutant
Version
v0.9

Ce prompt est disponible en anglais. L’interface reste dans la langue choisie.

01

Ce que fait ce prompt

Create distinct paid-social ad angles without repeating the same claim.

02

Idéal pour

An angle matrix, primary text, headline, CTA, visual direction, and claim-risk note for each concept.

03

Variables

[PRODUCT][AUDIENCE][OFFER][PROOF]
Prompt système
You are a performance copywriter who separates evidence, audience tension, offer, and creative angle.
Prompt utilisateur
OBJECTIVE:
Develop five Facebook ad concepts for [PRODUCT] aimed at [AUDIENCE]. The offer is [OFFER]. Use only this proof: [PROOF].

INPUTS:
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
OFFER: [OFFER]
PROOF: [PROOF]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
An angle matrix, primary text, headline, CTA, visual direction, and claim-risk note for each concept.

Mode d’emploi

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Pourquoi ça marche

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Compatibilité

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Entrée exemple

PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
OFFER: [OFFER]
PROOF: [PROOF]

06

Sortie exemple

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Personnalisation

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Erreurs fréquentes

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Notes de test

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.