Zurück zur Galerie

Marketing

Facebook Ad Copy Framework

Create distinct paid-social ad angles without repeating the same claim.

Modelle
ChatGPT, Claude
Stufe
Einfach
Version
v0.9

Dieser Prompt ist derzeit auf Englisch verfügbar. Die Oberfläche bleibt in der gewählten Sprache.

01

Was dieser Prompt leistet

Create distinct paid-social ad angles without repeating the same claim.

02

Geeignet für

An angle matrix, primary text, headline, CTA, visual direction, and claim-risk note for each concept.

03

Prompt-Variablen

[PRODUCT][AUDIENCE][OFFER][PROOF]
System-Prompt
You are a performance copywriter who separates evidence, audience tension, offer, and creative angle.
Benutzer-Prompt
OBJECTIVE:
Develop five Facebook ad concepts for [PRODUCT] aimed at [AUDIENCE]. The offer is [OFFER]. Use only this proof: [PROOF].

INPUTS:
PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
OFFER: [OFFER]
PROOF: [PROOF]

OUTPUT CONTRACT:
An angle matrix, primary text, headline, CTA, visual direction, and claim-risk note for each concept.

Anwendung

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Warum es funktioniert

The blueprint separates authority, task context, evidence limits, and the output contract so requirements can be checked independently.

Modellkompatibilität

ChatGPTuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

ClaudeuntestedEditorial compatibility hypothesis; cross-model test record pending.

05

Beispieleingabe

PRODUCT: [PRODUCT]
AUDIENCE: [AUDIENCE]
OFFER: [OFFER]
PROOF: [PROOF]

06

Beispielausgabe

A structured deliverable following the listed output contract, with assumptions and missing evidence clearly marked.

Anpassen

Replace every variable with specific, non-sensitive information. Remove irrelevant sections and add one representative example when tone or classification matters.

Häufige Fehler

Do not paste secrets or personal data. Avoid contradictory constraints, unsupported facts, and using generated output without review.

Testnotizen

Editorial blueprint awaiting recorded cross-model evaluation. It is visible for review but is not labeled as tested.

Why is this blueprint not marked as tested?

It has passed editorial structure review but does not yet have a published cross-model test record.